Grzela, Boryna’s drowned son
The PeasantsGrzela, Boryna’s drowned son, is known in the narrative through the news and aftermath of his death: he drowned at Easter, in his twenty-sixth year, before the harvest he had been expected to return for. His absence turns ordinary expectations of homecoming, marriage, and inheritance into a family’s unfinished future.
Identity and Circumstances of His Death
A letter brings word that Grzela has drowned. The report says the accident occurred at Easter and that his belongings can be collected from the head of the powiat. The timing makes his death especially stark: he was young, described as strong and healthy, and expected back for the harvest.
The narrative also recalls that Grzela had nearly drowned before, in the pond, and that Kłąb had saved him. Those who mourn him connect that earlier danger to his final death by water, speaking of the outcome as though it had been written in advance. This is a retrospective interpretation of his fate, not an explanation of how the drowning happened.
News and Mourning
Hanka learns the news when the miller reads the letter. She is distressed by the report, and later carries the grief into Magda’s home, where the two women lament together. Magda remembers Grzela as a strong young man and says he had wanted so badly to be home. Their mourning makes clear that his expected return was not merely a date on the farm calendar: it was a shared hope that his presence would restore someone loved to the household.
The grief is intense but occurs within lives already crowded by daily hardship. After crying together, Hanka and Magda part to return to their own troubles. The scene places a death that has transformed the family’s expectations beside the persistence of work and ordinary burdens.
Family and the Future He Leaves Behind
A later remembrance presents Grzela as a beloved brother. His sister says that, before hearing of his death from Voyt, she had been thinking about how they would divide the land and had even imagined a wife for him. His death therefore removes not only a family member but also a participant in the household’s anticipated arrangements for land and marriage.
The sister’s recollection gives Grzela a life beyond the brief facts of the death report. He had been expected to return, to share in decisions about land, and to begin a married life. None of these plans comes to pass; his family is left to reckon with both the loss itself and the future they had already begun to picture.